With E Jean Carroll damages at the forefront, this case has ignited a firestorm of discussion about the complexities of quantifying damages in sexual assault cases. Beyond the monetary figures, the case explores the emotional and reputational toll, highlighting the often-invisible wounds inflicted. This deep dive into the specifics of the damages claimed promises to be an insightful look into a pivotal moment in legal history.
This article delves into the various types of damages sought by E Jean Carroll, examining the financial losses, emotional distress, and reputational harm. We’ll explore the legal framework surrounding these claims, analyzing the arguments presented by both sides and considering potential precedents for future cases. The public reaction and media portrayal will also be scrutinized, ultimately providing a complete picture of this multifaceted legal battle.
Overview of E Jean Carroll Damages
E Jean Carroll’s lawsuit against Donald Trump seeks substantial compensation for the alleged damages she suffered. The damages claimed encompass a wide range of impacts, from the immediate emotional distress to the long-term effects on her career and reputation. This analysis will delve into the specific types of damages, the legal precedents that underpin them, and the potential implications for the defendant.The damages sought by E Jean Carroll are multifaceted, aiming to address the profound and lasting impact of the alleged assault and subsequent public scrutiny.
These damages extend beyond immediate financial losses and encompass the significant emotional distress and reputational harm she experienced.
Types of Damages Claimed
Carroll’s claim for damages encompasses various categories, including compensatory and punitive damages. Compensatory damages are intended to restore the plaintiff to the position she would have been in had the harm not occurred. Punitive damages, on the other hand, are designed to punish the defendant for their actions and deter similar conduct in the future. The legal system aims to address both the immediate and long-term effects of the alleged harm.
- Emotional Distress: Carroll likely seeks compensation for the significant emotional distress caused by the alleged assault, including fear, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Examples of emotional distress damages in similar cases often include therapy costs, lost wages due to inability to work, and pain and suffering.
- Reputational Harm: The public nature of the accusations and the subsequent legal proceedings have undoubtedly affected Carroll’s public image and professional reputation. She may seek damages for the harm done to her career and standing within her field. Previous cases have recognized reputational damage as a significant component of harm, and this may include the difficulty in obtaining future work or contracts.
- Medical Expenses: Any medical expenses incurred by Carroll as a result of the alleged assault, such as therapy sessions or counseling, would be a part of her claim for damages. This often includes documented evidence of treatment and related expenses.
- Lost Earnings: The alleged assault and the ensuing legal battle may have impacted Carroll’s ability to earn income. She may seek compensation for lost wages, reduced earning capacity, or the inability to secure new professional opportunities. Cases with similar themes often include detailed records of income and career history.
Legal Framework for Damages
The legal framework for awarding damages in cases involving assault and battery, as well as the resulting emotional distress and reputational harm, is well-established. The specifics of these claims will be evaluated by the court based on the evidence presented and the legal precedents established in similar cases.
E Jean Carroll’s damages are a fascinating case, and it’s interesting to consider how the legal battles unfold. Looking at Chita Rivera’s career highlights, particularly her Broadway achievements, provides a different perspective on navigating public life and the challenges of maintaining a strong reputation, like chita rivera key moments career. Ultimately, though, the focus returns to the complexities of Carroll’s situation and the ongoing implications for the legal system.
- Compensatory Damages: Courts typically consider the extent of the harm, the severity of the assault, and the impact on the victim’s life when calculating compensatory damages. This often involves a thorough review of evidence, witness testimonies, and expert opinions to determine the appropriate amount.
- Punitive Damages: Punitive damages are awarded to punish the defendant and deter similar behavior. Courts often consider the defendant’s intent, the severity of the actions, and the need to send a message. The amount awarded for punitive damages can be substantial, and it’s intended to act as a deterrent.
Potential Impact on the Defendant
A substantial award of damages could have significant implications for the defendant, particularly in terms of financial responsibility and potential reputational harm.
- Financial Burden: A large award of damages could place a considerable financial burden on the defendant, potentially impacting their personal finances and future activities. This is a common outcome in high-profile cases involving substantial claims.
- Reputational Damage: A negative judgment and a significant award could severely damage the defendant’s public image and reputation, potentially impacting their professional and personal life.
Financial Damages
E Jean Carroll’s legal battle has brought significant attention to the often-hidden financial burdens faced by victims of sexual assault and harassment. Beyond the emotional toll, there are substantial financial losses, including lost earnings, emotional distress, and reputational damage. Understanding these claims is crucial to grasping the full impact of such experiences.The calculation of these damages is complex, involving various factors, and often relies on expert testimony and meticulous documentation.
E Jean Carroll’s damages are a complex issue, deeply intertwined with the legal battle surrounding her allegations. Understanding the nuances of these claims often involves delving into related concepts like parental rights and inheritance, especially when considering how a child’s name might be affected. This is especially relevant when considering the legal aspects of naming a child, like the ‘apellido bebe madre padre’ process, which dictates the child’s last name.
This fascinating area of law provides important context when exploring the wider ramifications of E Jean Carroll’s damages. Ultimately, the details surrounding the damages remain crucial to understanding the full scope of the legal case.
Different methodologies exist for assessing each type of loss, and precedent cases provide a framework for determining appropriate compensation. Ultimately, the goal is to provide a fair and just recompense for the harm inflicted.
Specific Financial Losses Claimed
This section details the financial losses E Jean Carroll alleges she has suffered. The claims include lost income, emotional distress resulting in medical expenses, and damage to her professional reputation, all stemming from the alleged assault and harassment.
Methods for Calculating Financial Damages
Several methods are employed to quantify the financial damages in cases like Carroll’s. For lost earnings, expert economists often analyze career trajectories, potential future earnings, and lost opportunities due to the alleged incident. Emotional distress damages are often calculated by considering the nature and extent of the trauma, any related medical expenses, and the impact on daily life.
Reputational harm involves analyzing the decline in professional opportunities and the negative impact on public perception, often using expert testimony.
Precedent Cases and Comparable Settlements
Numerous precedents exist in similar cases that offer insights into compensation amounts. These precedents consider the severity of the assault or harassment, the duration of the harm, and the specific circumstances of the victim. Comparing similar cases provides a range of potential settlements and offers a context for evaluating the claims made in Carroll’s case. For instance, similar cases involving defamation or sexual assault have established precedents for compensation.
E Jean Carroll’s damages are a significant topic, but the recent embezzlement at the Eugene Weekly printing company, detailed in this article , highlights a different kind of financial hurt. While the specifics of the printing company scandal are separate, it’s still worth considering the larger issue of financial wrongdoing when thinking about the broader impact of similar events on individual and community trust.
The complexities of both situations, however, likely influence the overall landscape of e Jean Carroll’s damages claim.
Examples of Comparable Financial Settlements
While specifics of settlements in similar cases aren’t always publicly available, documented settlements in cases of defamation and sexual assault offer valuable context. These settlements often involve significant financial compensation to cover lost earnings, emotional distress, and reputational damage. The amount awarded varies considerably based on the specific circumstances, such as the severity of the harm, the public nature of the allegations, and the evidence presented.
Table of Financial Damages Claimed
| Type of Damage | Amount Claimed | Supporting Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Lost Earnings | $XX,XXX | Expert testimony on career trajectory, projected income, and lost opportunities. |
| Emotional Distress | $YY,YYY | Medical records, therapist notes, and personal testimony describing the trauma and its impact. |
| Reputational Harm | $ZZ,ZZZ | Expert testimony on the decline in professional opportunities, loss of endorsements, and the negative impact on public perception. Evidence of lost contracts, decreased speaking engagements, and negative press coverage. |
Non-Financial Damages
The E. Jean Carroll case has brought the complex and often subjective nature of non-financial damages into sharp focus. Beyond the monetary losses, Carroll claims significant emotional harm, humiliation, and a profound invasion of her privacy. Quantifying these intangible losses presents unique challenges for the courts, requiring meticulous examination of the evidence and careful consideration of precedent.Assessing the impact of such profound personal harm on a plaintiff’s well-being, reputation, and future prospects is a delicate task.
Legal frameworks for evaluating non-financial damages, while existing, are not always straightforward. Different jurisdictions and legal precedents influence how courts approach these cases. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the arguments presented and the applicable legal standards is crucial to comprehend the potential outcome.
Emotional Distress Claims
Emotional distress, a core element of Carroll’s non-financial damages claim, encompasses a wide range of negative emotional responses. This can include anxiety, depression, insomnia, feelings of shame, and profound psychological distress. The emotional impact of the alleged events and the ensuing public scrutiny can be significant. Evidence of emotional distress often involves detailed accounts of the plaintiff’s psychological state.
Humiliation and Invasion of Privacy
Humiliation, often a consequence of public accusations, can lead to a diminished sense of self-worth and social isolation. Invasion of privacy, in this context, relates to the public disclosure of private information and the violation of one’s personal space. These damages are not easily quantifiable, and courts must carefully consider the nature and extent of the humiliation and invasion of privacy suffered by the plaintiff.
Quantifying Non-Financial Damages
Assigning monetary values to emotional distress, humiliation, and invasion of privacy is inherently complex. There’s no direct, universally accepted formula for this. Courts often rely on a variety of factors to assess the extent of non-financial harm. These factors include the severity of the incident, the duration of the harm, the impact on the plaintiff’s life, and the nature of the evidence presented.
“The courts seek to balance the need to compensate the plaintiff for their harm with the need to avoid arbitrary or excessive awards.”
Experts in psychology and psychiatry are often called upon to provide expert testimony on the impact of the event on the plaintiff’s mental and emotional well-being.
E Jean Carroll’s damages are a significant discussion point, but the impact of climate change on events like snow polo in St. Moritz is equally concerning. The dwindling snowpack impacting the sport highlights the broader issue of environmental shifts, and how these changes can affect seemingly unrelated activities. This situation mirrors the complex interplay of factors impacting E Jean Carroll’s damages and the broader societal implications.
For more on the snow polo situation, check out this article about snow polo st moritz climate change. Ultimately, both situations demonstrate the interconnectedness of our world and the need for greater awareness and action.
Evidence of Emotional Distress
Evidence of emotional distress typically involves a combination of direct and indirect evidence. Direct evidence includes the plaintiff’s testimony, describing their emotional reactions, experiences, and the impact on their daily life. Indirect evidence can include medical records, therapist notes, and even statements from close family and friends. The goal is to demonstrate a clear link between the defendant’s actions and the plaintiff’s emotional suffering.
Table of Potential Non-Financial Damages
| Type of Damage | Potential Monetary Valuation | Factors Influencing Valuation |
|---|---|---|
| Emotional Distress | $X to $Y | Severity, duration, impact on daily life, medical records, therapy notes, testimony |
| Humiliation | $X to $Y | Public nature of accusations, duration of public scrutiny, impact on social interactions, testimony |
| Invasion of Privacy | $X to $Y | Nature of disclosed information, extent of intrusion, impact on personal life, testimony |
Note: $X and $Y represent ranges, as the specific amounts are determined by the individual circumstances of each case.
Legal Arguments Regarding Damages: E Jean Carroll Damages
The E. Jean Carroll trial highlighted a complex interplay of legal arguments regarding damages, challenging the court to balance the plaintiff’s suffering with the defendant’s defense. This involved evaluating the evidence presented, examining the defendant’s counterarguments, and analyzing relevant legal precedents. The ultimate decision on damages rested heavily on the persuasiveness of the evidence and the judge’s interpretation of the law.The crux of the matter was determining not just
E Jean Carroll’s damages are a hot topic right now, and it’s fascinating to see how these high-profile cases are impacting the public conversation. Recent news surrounding stars like Harley, Johnston, Oettinger, and Benn is definitely adding fuel to the fire. This group is raising some interesting questions about power, responsibility, and the complex dynamics of fame and reputation, ultimately affecting the larger discussion surrounding E Jean Carroll’s damages.
It’s all quite compelling, isn’t it?
- if* the alleged harm occurred, but also
- how much* that harm affected Ms. Carroll. This involved quantifying emotional distress, reputational harm, and other non-economic losses, alongside any demonstrable financial losses. The legal arguments encompassed the extent to which these damages could be proven, and whether they were a direct consequence of the defendant’s actions.
Arguments Supporting Requested Damages
Ms. Carroll’s legal team presented a multifaceted argument, emphasizing the impact of the alleged assault and subsequent public revelations on her well-being. They likely cited evidence such as therapy records, witness testimony, and accounts of emotional distress to substantiate claims for non-economic damages. Moreover, they would have argued for damages based on the impact on her career and reputation.
Specific instances of decreased opportunities or professional setbacks, perhaps substantiated by evidence of lost earnings or opportunities, would have been presented.
Evidence Presented to Substantiate Damages
Evidence presented in court likely included Ms. Carroll’s personal testimony, medical records documenting her emotional distress, and potential testimony from therapists or counselors. Furthermore, evidence of lost income or opportunities could have been presented. The strength of this evidence was crucial in persuading the judge to grant the requested damages.
Defendant’s Arguments Against Claimed Damages
The defendant’s legal team likely countered by arguing that the alleged damages were not directly caused by the defendant’s actions or were exaggerated. They might have questioned the credibility of Ms. Carroll’s testimony, or presented evidence contradicting her claims. Possible arguments included the assertion that the alleged harm was not substantial enough to warrant the requested damages, or that the events in question did not have a significant impact on her life.
Comparison of Legal Precedents Cited by Both Parties
Both parties likely cited relevant legal precedents concerning the assessment of damages in similar cases. Ms. Carroll’s legal team would have highlighted precedents establishing the appropriate standards for awarding damages in cases of emotional distress, defamation, or assault. The defense would have presented precedents suggesting limitations on damages in cases where the link between the defendant’s actions and the claimed harm was deemed insufficient.
Potential for Future Legal Challenges
The case’s outcome could potentially open avenues for future legal challenges related to the measurement of damages in similar situations. The specific legal standards applied in this case might influence future rulings concerning the quantification of emotional distress, reputational harm, or other non-economic losses.
Table of Arguments for and Against Damages
| Argument Category | Arguments For | Arguments Against | Relevant Laws |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emotional Distress | Therapy records, personal testimony, witness accounts | Questioning credibility, lack of direct causation | Emotional Distress Tort Laws (State Specific) |
| Reputational Harm | Evidence of lost opportunities, public statements | Lack of substantial proof, counter-arguments | Defamation Laws (State Specific) |
| Financial Damages | Evidence of lost income, career disruption | Questioning causation, alternative explanations | Contract and Tort Laws (State Specific) |
Public Perception and Impact
The E. Jean Carroll damages verdict has ignited a firestorm of public reaction, prompting intense debate about sexual assault, victim’s rights, and the legal system. The substantial monetary award, and the nature of the allegations, have significantly impacted public discourse, raising crucial questions about the future of similar cases.The case has sparked a complex conversation, highlighting the deeply personal and often emotionally charged nature of sexual assault claims.
The public response, encompassing diverse opinions, reveals the sensitivity and potential for polarization surrounding such issues. Understanding the public’s perception and the potential ramifications of this case is crucial for analyzing its broader societal implications.
Public Reaction to the Damages
The public reaction to the damages awarded in the E. Jean Carroll case has been varied and passionate. Some applaud the verdict as a victory for victims of sexual assault, emphasizing the importance of holding perpetrators accountable and recognizing the long-term trauma associated with such experiences. Others express concern over the size of the award, arguing it sets a precedent for excessive compensation in similar cases.
Social media platforms have been particularly active, showcasing a wide range of opinions, from strong support for Ms. Carroll to skepticism about the validity of her claims.
Potential Impact on Similar Cases
The Carroll case’s outcome has significant implications for future sexual assault lawsuits. The high-profile nature of the case, coupled with the substantial damages awarded, could influence future cases by setting a benchmark for compensation. This may lead to increased scrutiny of similar claims, with potential implications for both the plaintiff and the defendant. It’s crucial to acknowledge that every case is unique, and legal precedents are nuanced.
Media Portrayal of the Damages
Media coverage of the E. Jean Carroll damages has varied, reflecting the multifaceted nature of the case. Some outlets have emphasized the significance of the verdict, highlighting the need for accountability in sexual assault cases. Others have focused on the financial aspects of the award, raising concerns about potential repercussions for similar legal battles. The media’s portrayal of the damages has shaped public understanding, often highlighting specific details or angles to frame the story.
Effects on Public Understanding of Sexual Assault Cases
The E. Jean Carroll case has likely influenced the public’s understanding of sexual assault cases. The high-profile nature of the trial, and the detailed media coverage, may increase awareness of the complexities and sensitivities involved in such legal battles. The verdict has, arguably, exposed the public to a more nuanced understanding of the trauma associated with sexual assault and the need for legal redress.
However, the case also risks perpetuating misconceptions or exacerbating existing biases, which could have an adverse impact on similar cases.
Broader Societal Implications
The damages awarded in the E. Jean Carroll case have far-reaching societal implications. The verdict’s impact on public perception of sexual assault claims, and the potential for future litigation, could influence policies and attitudes towards such issues. The case serves as a reminder of the societal costs of sexual violence, and the complexities of addressing such injustices.
Table: Media Portrayals and Public Opinions
| Media Outlet/Source | Portrayal of Damages | Public Opinion |
|---|---|---|
| News Channel A | Focused on the financial aspect, raising concerns about precedent | Mixed; Some concerned about potential for frivolous lawsuits, others support Ms. Carroll |
| News Channel B | Highlighted the importance of accountability for sexual assault | Supportive of Ms. Carroll; emphasizing the need for justice |
| Social Media Platform X | Highly polarized, with both strong support and strong criticism | Very divided; varied opinions based on individual beliefs and values |
| Online Forums | Discussion often centered on legal precedent and potential for similar cases | Mixed opinions, reflecting the nuances of the case and potential future implications |
Expert Testimony and Analysis
Expert testimony plays a crucial role in quantifying and validating the damages suffered in legal cases like the E. Jean Carroll case. Expert witnesses bring specialized knowledge and analysis to bear on complex issues, helping juries understand the extent of harm and the associated costs. Their testimony is vital in establishing the factual basis for compensation, providing a framework for assessing the impact of the alleged harm on the plaintiff.Expert witnesses provide a crucial link between the abstract nature of damages and the tangible reality of the harm suffered.
Their opinions and methodologies are subject to scrutiny and debate, and the weight given to their testimony can significantly influence the outcome of a case. By examining the methodologies and conclusions of expert witnesses, we can gain a deeper understanding of how damages are assessed in such high-profile cases.
Expert Opinions on Financial Losses
Expert testimony on financial losses often involves evaluating lost income, diminished earning capacity, and additional expenses incurred as a result of the alleged harm. These experts may use statistical models, economic projections, and other analytical tools to quantify these losses. For instance, an expert might use industry data and the plaintiff’s past income history to project future earnings, accounting for potential career interruptions or shifts in the job market.
They may also assess the impact of emotional distress on earning capacity. A detailed understanding of the plaintiff’s work history, including job titles, responsibilities, and income levels, is crucial for accurate projections. Moreover, the expert must account for any adjustments to income due to age, education, or experience.
Expert Opinions on Emotional Distress, E jean carroll damages
Expert testimony on emotional distress delves into the psychological and emotional consequences of the alleged harm. Psychologists or psychiatrists are often called upon to evaluate the plaintiff’s mental state, providing evidence of emotional distress, anxiety, or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Their assessments often involve detailed interviews, psychological tests, and medical records. This testimony can be particularly complex, as establishing a direct causal link between the alleged harm and the emotional distress experienced can be challenging.
Examples from past cases often highlight the importance of establishing clear timelines, documentation, and consistency in the plaintiff’s reported symptoms.
Comparing Methodologies Used by Different Expert Witnesses
Different expert witnesses may employ varying methodologies to arrive at their conclusions. Some may rely on established statistical models, while others may use more qualitative approaches. The choice of methodology can significantly impact the estimated damages. For instance, in cases involving lost earning capacity, one expert might focus on a detailed analysis of comparable positions in the job market, while another might use a broader macroeconomic model.
The reliability and validity of the methodologies employed by different experts are crucial factors in evaluating their testimony. The strengths and weaknesses of each approach should be carefully considered.
Expert Testimony in Similar Cases
Expert testimony has played a significant role in influencing the outcomes of similar cases in the past. Cases involving allegations of sexual assault and harassment have often relied on expert testimony to establish the extent of emotional distress and psychological trauma. Analyzing precedents in similar cases provides valuable context for understanding the impact of expert testimony on the legal process.
Furthermore, the methodology used in these precedents can serve as a benchmark for evaluating the quality and validity of expert testimony in current cases.
Structure of an Expert Testimony Report
| Section | Description |
|---|---|
| Introduction | Brief overview of the case and the expert’s role. |
| Methodology | Detailed explanation of the methods used to arrive at conclusions. This should include the data sources, analytical tools, and any assumptions made. For example, if using statistical models, the specific models and their parameters would be Artikeld. If using psychological evaluations, the specific tests administered, the scoring criteria, and the interpretation of results would be included. |
| Findings | Presentation of the results obtained from the analysis. |
| Conclusions | Summary of the key findings and their implications for the case. |
| Limitations | Identification of any limitations in the methodology or data that may affect the conclusions. |
Potential Outcomes and Future Implications
The E. Jean Carroll case has transcended a simple defamation suit, igniting a national conversation about sexual assault, gender equality, and the power dynamics within legal proceedings. The potential ramifications of this case extend far beyond the courtroom, impacting future litigation, societal perceptions, and perhaps even public policy. Understanding these potential outcomes is crucial for comprehending the case’s broader significance.
Possible Outcomes Regarding Damages
The jury’s decision on damages will significantly influence the case’s legacy. A substantial award could establish a precedent for similar cases, empowering victims to pursue legal action and potentially deter future misconduct. Conversely, a minimal award might weaken the position of future plaintiffs, diminishing the perceived value of such claims. The amount of damages awarded will undoubtedly shape public perception and influence future legal strategies.
Potential Impact on Future Lawsuits
This case will undoubtedly set a precedent for future sexual assault lawsuits. The jury’s decision will shape the standards for proving damages, establishing a new benchmark for assessing compensation for emotional distress and reputational harm. If the damages awarded are substantial, it will encourage more victims to come forward and potentially lead to an increase in similar cases.
Precedent for Similar Cases
The precedent set by this case will be pivotal. A substantial award for damages could embolden future plaintiffs in similar situations, encouraging them to pursue legal action and hold perpetrators accountable. Conversely, a low or no award would send a different message, potentially discouraging future claims. The decision will be scrutinized for its impact on the legal landscape and its potential to reshape the trajectory of sexual assault litigation.
Long-Term Effects on Individuals and Society
The case’s outcome will have a lasting impact on individuals and society. A favorable verdict could empower survivors and foster a sense of justice, while a less favorable one could perpetuate the systemic silencing of victims. It could influence public discourse, reshape legal strategies, and perhaps even alter societal attitudes toward sexual assault and gender equality. Ultimately, the case’s outcome will contribute to the broader conversation surrounding these critical issues.
Influence on Public Policy
The outcome of the case could potentially influence public policy related to sexual assault, particularly regarding legal protections for victims and accountability for perpetrators. A high damage award could trigger discussions about mandatory reporting laws, increased funding for victim support services, or even changes to laws surrounding defamation or civil liberties. The outcome of the case could be a significant catalyst for change in public policy.
Table of Potential Outcomes and Effects
| Potential Outcome | Potential Effects |
|---|---|
| Substantial Damage Award | Empowerment of victims, deterrence of future misconduct, increased legal action, potential shift in societal attitudes towards sexual assault. |
| Minimal Damage Award | Weakening of plaintiffs’ position, potential decrease in future legal actions, less deterrence of misconduct. |
| No Award | Discouragement of future claims, possible exacerbation of systemic silencing of victims. |
Wrap-Up
In conclusion, the E Jean Carroll damages case represents a significant moment in the ongoing conversation about sexual assault and its impact. The complexities of quantifying both financial and non-financial damages, alongside the intricate legal arguments, underscore the need for empathy and understanding in these sensitive situations. The outcome of this case will undoubtedly shape the future of similar lawsuits and have far-reaching consequences for individuals and society as a whole.
Helpful Answers
What specific financial losses are claimed?
The financial losses claimed by E Jean Carroll likely include lost earnings, medical expenses, and costs associated with therapy or counseling to address the emotional distress. Specific amounts are likely detailed in the court documents.
How are non-financial damages typically presented in court?
Evidence of emotional distress often involves testimonies from the claimant and potentially therapists, counselors, or other experts. Documentation like journal entries, medical records, or photos may also be used to substantiate the emotional trauma.
What are the potential long-term effects of this case on society?
The outcome of this case may set a precedent for future sexual assault cases, influencing how damages are calculated and the types of evidence that are considered. This could lead to increased public awareness and potentially reform in legal procedures and public policy regarding sexual assault.
